Learning a Joint Embedding of Multiple Satellite Sensors: A Case Study for Lake Ice Monitoring

TL;DR

This paper introduces a deep learning approach to fuse multi-sensor satellite imagery for lake ice monitoring, achieving high accuracy and temporal resolution, and setting new standards in ice date detection.

Contribution

It proposes a novel joint embedding neural network architecture for multi-sensor satellite data fusion, enabling improved lake ice mapping and ice date detection.

Findings

Pixel-wise accuracy > 91% in ice mapping

Temporal resolution of < 1.5 days achieved

State-of-the-art ice-on and ice-off date detection

Abstract

Fusing satellite imagery acquired with different sensors has been a long-standing challenge of Earth observation, particularly across different modalities such as optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images. Here, we explore the joint analysis of imagery from different sensors in the light of representation learning: we propose to learn a joint embedding of multiple satellite sensors within a deep neural network. Our application problem is the monitoring of lake ice on Alpine lakes. To reach the temporal resolution requirement of the Swiss Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) office, we combine three image sources: Sentinel-1 SAR (S1-SAR), Terra MODIS, and Suomi-NPP VIIRS. The large gaps between the optical and SAR domains and between the sensor resolutions make this a challenging instance of the sensor fusion problem. Our approach can be classified as a late fusion that is learned in a data-driven manner. The proposed network architecture has separate encoding branches for each image sensor, which feed into a single latent embedding. I.e., a common feature representation shared by all inputs, such that subsequent processing steps deliver comparable output irrespective of which sort of input image was used. By fusing satellite data, we map lake ice at a temporal resolution of < 1.5 days. The network produces spatially explicit lake ice maps with pixel-wise accuracies > 91% (respectively, mIoU scores > 60%) and generalises well across different lakes and winters. Moreover, it sets a new state-of-the-art for determining the important ice-on and ice-off dates for the target lakes, in many cases meeting the GCOS requirement.