One size does not fit all: Evidence for a range of mixing efficiencies in stellar evolution calculations
Cole Johnston ((1) Department of Astrophysics, IMAPP, Radboud, University Nijmegen, the Netherlands (2) Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven,, Belgium)

TL;DR
This paper shows that stellar evolution models often underestimate convective core masses in intermediate- and high-mass stars, indicating the need for more efficient internal mixing mechanisms to match observations.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of observed core masses with models, demonstrating the necessity of enhanced mixing to accurately reproduce stellar core properties.
Findings
Observed core masses are consistently larger than model predictions.
Current models require more efficient mixing to match high-precision data.
Implications for post-main sequence evolution of stars with convective cores.
Abstract
Context: Internal chemical mixing in intermediate- and high-mass stars represents an immense uncertainty in stellar evolution models.In addition to extending the main-sequence lifetime, chemical mixing also appreciably increases the mass of the stellar core. Several studies have made attempts to calibrate the efficiency of different convective boundary mixing mechanisms, with sometimes seemingly conflicting results. Aims: We aim to demonstrate that stellar models regularly under-predict the masses of convective stellar cores. Methods: We gather convective core mass and fractional core hydrogen content inferences from numerous independent binary and asteroseismic studies, and compare them to stellar evolution models computed with the MESA stellar evolution code. Results: We demonstrate that core mass inferences from the literature are ubiquitously more massive than predicted by stellar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
