Perfectly Matched Sets in Graphs: Parameterized and Exact Computation
N.R. Aravind, Roopam Saxena

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of finding perfectly matched sets in graphs, providing fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for certain parameters, proving hardness results, and presenting an exact exponential algorithm.
Contribution
It introduces new FPT algorithms for PMS based on graph parameters, proves W[1]-hardness and kernelization lower bounds, and offers an exact exponential algorithm.
Findings
PMS is W[1]-hard parameterized by solution size k.
PMS is FPT with respect to clique-width, distance to cluster, co-cluster, and treewidth.
PMS remains NP-hard on planar graphs.
Abstract
In an undirected graph , we say is a pair of perfectly matched sets if and are disjoint subsets of and every vertex in (resp. ) has exactly one neighbor in (resp. ). The size of a pair of perfectly matched sets is . The PERFECTLY MATCHED SETS problem is to decide whether a given graph has a pair of perfectly matched sets of size . We show that PMS is -hard when parameterized by solution size even when restricted to split graphs and bipartite graphs. We observe that PMS is FPT when parameterized by clique-width, and give FPT algorithms with respect to the parameters distance to cluster, distance to co-cluster and treewidth. Complementing FPT results, we show that PMS does not admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by vertex cover number unless . We also provide an exact exponential…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
