On a formula that is not in "Grothendieck Topologies in Posets"
Eduardo Ochs

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the explicit formula for converting a nucleus to a subset within the context of Grothendieck topologies on Artinian posets, filling a gap in the existing theoretical framework.
Contribution
It provides the explicit formula for the nucleus-to-subset conversion, enhancing understanding of the bijections in Grothendieck topologies on Artinian posets.
Findings
Explicit formula for nucleus to subset conversion
Completes the bijection framework in the existing theory
Clarifies the relationship between nuclei and subsets
Abstract
The paper "Grothendieck Topologies on Posets" by A.J. Lindenhovius shows that when is an Artinian poset and is the topos then there are bijections between the set of subsets of , the set of Grothendieck topologies on , and the set of nuclei on the Heyting Algebra . It also shows that there are nice formulas for converting between subsets, Grothendieck topologies, and nuclei, but the formula for converting a nucleus to a subset is not spelled out explicitly. These notes fix that gap.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
