Sr and Ba abundance determinations: comparing machine-learning with star-by-star analyses -- High-resolution re-analysis of suspected LAMOST barium stars
D. Karinkuzhi (1,2), S. Van Eck (2), A. Jorissen (2), A. Escorza (3),, S. Shetye (2), T. Merle (2), L. Siess (2), S. Goriely (2), H. Van Winckel (4), ((1) Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India,, (2) Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique

TL;DR
This study re-analyzed suspected barium stars identified in low-resolution spectra using high-resolution spectroscopy to confirm s-process element enrichment and assess the effectiveness of machine-learning methods in stellar abundance analysis.
Contribution
It provides a high-resolution re-analysis of a large sample of s-process-rich candidates, comparing results with previous machine-learning classifications and revealing the true nature of these stars.
Findings
High-resolution spectra confirmed s-process enrichment in several stars.
Machine-learning techniques on low-resolution spectra can misclassify stars' s-process status.
Binary status correlates with s-process enrichment in the sample.
Abstract
A new large sample of 895 s-process-rich candidates out of 454180 giant stars surveyed by LAMOST at low spectral resolution (R ~ 1800) has been reported by Norfolk et al. (2019; hereafter N19). We aim at confirming the s-process enrichment at the higher resolution (R ~ 86000) offered by the HERMES-Mercator spectrograph, for the 15 brightest targets of the previous study sample which consists in 13 Sr-only stars and two Ba-only stars. Abundances were derived for elements Li, C, N, O, Na, Mg, Fe, Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Ba, La, and Ce. Binarity has been tested by comparing the Gaia DR2 radial velocity with the HERMES velocity obtained 1600 - 1800 days later. Among the 15 programme stars, four show no s-process overabundances ([X/Fe] < 0.2 dex), eight show mild s-process overabundances (at least three heavy elements with 0.2 < [X/Fe] < 0.8), and three have strong overabundances (at least three…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
