Testing Evolutionary Models with Red Supergiant and Wolf-Rayet Populations
Philip Massey, Kathryn F. Neugent, Trevor Z. Dorn-Wallenstein, J. J., Eldridge, E. R. Stanway, and Emily M. Levesque

TL;DR
This study compares observed ratios of red supergiants and Wolf-Rayet stars in nearby galaxies with evolutionary models, finding good agreement when adjusting temperature scales, thus improving understanding of massive star evolution.
Contribution
It reexamines the RSG/WR ratio across different metallicities using new surveys and aligns observational data with modern evolutionary models, resolving previous discrepancies.
Findings
Good agreement between observations and models after temperature scale adjustment.
RSG/WR ratio decreases with metallicity, matching model predictions.
Enhanced observational techniques improve classification accuracy.
Abstract
Despite the many successes that modern massive star evolutionary theory has enjoyed, reproducing the apparent trend in the relative number of red supergiants (RSGs) and Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars has remained elusive. Previous estimates show the RSG/WR ratio decreasing strongly with increasing metallicity. However, the evolutionary models have always predicted a relatively flat distribution for the RSG/WR ratio. In this paper we reexamine this issue, drawing on recent surveys for RSGs and WRs in the Magellanic Clouds, M31, and M33. The RSG surveys have used Gaia astrometry to eliminate foreground contamination, and have separated RSGs from asymptotic giant branch stars using near-infrared colors. The surveys for WRs have utilized interference filter imaging, photometry, and image subtraction techniques to identify candidates, which have then been confirmed spectroscopically. After carefully…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
