Calibration of the liquid argon ionization response to low energy electronic and nuclear recoils with DarkSide-50
The DarkSide collaboration: P. Agnes, I.F.M. Albuquerque, T., Alexander, A.K. Alton, M. Ave, H.O. Back, G. Batignani, K. Biery, V. Bocci,, W.M. Bonivento, B. Bottino, S. Bussino, M. Cadeddu, M. Cadoni, F. Calaprice,, A. Caminata, N. Canci, M. Caravati, M. Cariello, M. Carlini

TL;DR
This paper reports the first measurements of ionization response in liquid argon for low-energy electronic and nuclear recoils, crucial for dark matter detection, down to unprecedented energy thresholds.
Contribution
It provides new low-energy ionization yield measurements for electronic and nuclear recoils in liquid argon, extending the detection capabilities for dark matter experiments.
Findings
Ionization yield for electronic recoils measured down to 180 eV
Ionization response for nuclear recoils determined down to 500 eV
First-ever low-energy nuclear recoil calibration in liquid argon
Abstract
DarkSide-50 has demonstrated the high potential of dual-phase liquid argon time projection chambers in exploring interactions of WIMPs in the GeV/c mass range. The technique, based on the detection of the ionization signal amplified via electroluminescence in the gas phase, allows to explore recoil energies down to the sub-keV range. We report here on the DarkSide-50 measurement of the ionization yield of electronic recoils down to 180~eV, exploiting Ar and Ar decays, and extrapolated to a few ionization electrons with the Thomas-Imel box model. Moreover, we present a model-dependent determination of the ionization response to nuclear recoils down to 500~eV, the lowest ever achieved in liquid argon, using \textit{in situ} neutron calibration sources and external datasets from neutron beam experiments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
