Seeing and Believing: Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Twitter Users
Tanveer Khan, Antonis Michalas

TL;DR
This paper develops a model to evaluate Twitter users' credibility, using behavioral data from 50,000 politicians and machine learning classifiers to distinguish trusted from untrusted users, aiming to enhance trust in social media.
Contribution
The study introduces a new credibility scoring model for Twitter users based on influence features and machine learning, including active learning for ambiguous cases.
Findings
The model achieved high accuracy in classifying trusted versus untrusted users.
Influence scores correlated with user credibility.
Active learning improved classification of ambiguous records.
Abstract
Social networking and micro-blogging services, such as Twitter, play an important role in sharing digital information. Despite the popularity and usefulness of social media, there have been many instances where corrupted users found ways to abuse it, as for instance, through raising or lowering user's credibility. As a result, while social media facilitates an unprecedented ease of access to information, it also introduces a new challenge - that of ascertaining the credibility of shared information. Currently, there is no automated way of determining which news or users are credible and which are not. Hence, establishing a system that can measure the social media user's credibility has become an issue of great importance. Assigning a credibility score to a user has piqued the interest of not only the research community but also most of the big players on both sides - such as Facebook,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
