Overturning negative construal of quantum superposition
Arkady Bolotin

TL;DR
This paper explores replacing traditional logic with an alternative reasoning model to address the negative construal of quantum superposition and the problem of definite outcomes.
Contribution
It proposes an alternative mathematical model of reasoning as a novel approach to resolve issues in quantum superposition interpretations.
Findings
Analyzes the limitations of current quantum formalism modifications.
Introduces an alternative reasoning model for quantum superposition.
Suggests a new perspective on the problem of definite outcomes.
Abstract
Construal of observable facts or events, that is, the manner in which we understand reality, is based not only on mathematical formulas of a theory suggested as a reasonable explanation for physical phenomena (like general relativity or quantum mechanics), but also on a mathematical model of reasoning used to analyze and appraise statements regarding the objective world (for example, logic of one type or the other). Hence, every time that a certain construal of reality encounters a problem, there is a choice between a modification to the mathematical formalism of the physical theory and a change in the model of reasoning. A case in point is negative construal of quantum superposition causing the problem of definite outcomes. To be sure, according to the said construal, it is not the case that a system being in a superposition of states is exclusively in one of the states constituting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Cognitive Science and Mapping
