Do Gedankenexperiments compel quantization of gravity?
Erik Rydving, Erik Aurell, Igor Pikovski

TL;DR
This paper argues that Gedankenexperiments involving gravity do not necessarily require gravity to be quantized, as previous paradoxes can be resolved without quantum gravity considerations, challenging common assumptions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the necessity for a quantum field theory of gravity is not supported by existing Gedankenexperiments, using only the Planck length as a resolution limit.
Findings
The paradox can be resolved without gravitational radiation quantization.
Effects are governed by the mass octopole, not quadrupole.
No Gedankenexperiment so far compels quantum gravity.
Abstract
Whether gravity is quantized remains an open question. To shed light on this problem, various Gedankenexperiments have been proposed. One popular example is an interference experiment with a massive system that interacts gravitationally with another distant system, where an apparent paradox arises: even for space-like separation the outcome of the interference experiment depends on actions on the distant system, leading to a violation of either complementarity or no-signalling. A recent resolution shows that the paradox is avoided when quantizing gravitational radiation and including quantum fluctuations of the gravitational field. Here we show that the paradox in question can also be resolved without considering gravitational radiation, relying only on the Planck length as a limit on spatial resolution. Therefore, in contrast to conclusions previously drawn, we find that the necessity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
