Non-classical polynomials and the inverse theorem
Aaron Berger, Ashwin Sah, Mehtaab Sawhney, Jonathan Tidor

TL;DR
This paper investigates the necessity of non-classical polynomials in the inverse theorem for the Gowers $U^k$-norm over finite fields, providing new results especially for the case when $k=p+1$ and beyond.
Contribution
It characterizes precisely when non-classical polynomials are needed in the inverse theorem for the Gowers $U^k$-norm, including a new result for the case $k=p+1$.
Findings
Bounded functions with large $U^k$-norm correlate with classical polynomials for $k \\leq p+1$.
Non-classical polynomials are necessary for $k \\geq p+2$ in the inverse theorem.
The paper provides a complete characterization of when classical polynomials suffice.
Abstract
In this note we characterize when non-classical polynomials are necessary in the inverse theorem for the Gowers -norm. We give a brief deduction of the fact that a bounded function on with large -norm must correlate with a classical polynomial when . To the best of our knowledge, this result is new for (when ). We then prove that non-classical polynomials are necessary in the inverse theorem for the Gowers -norm over for all , completely characterizing when classical polynomials suffice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
