Efficient M\"obius Transformations and their applications to Dempster-Shafer Theory: Clarification and implementation
Maxime Chaveroche, Franck Davoine, V\'eronique Cherfaoui

TL;DR
This paper introduces Efficient M"obius Transformations (EMT), which significantly reduce computational complexity in Dempster-Shafer Theory by exploiting lattice structures and belief source information, with practical implementation details.
Contribution
It proposes EMT sequences that optimize DST computations by combining lattice structure and belief source information, improving efficiency over existing algorithms.
Findings
EMT has lower complexity than traditional lattice-based algorithms.
EMT effectively fuses belief sources in DST.
Applicability extends to any function in finite distributive lattices.
Abstract
Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST) generalizes Bayesian probability theory, offering useful additional information, but suffers from a high computational burden. A lot of work has been done to reduce the complexity of computations used in information fusion with Dempster's rule. The main approaches exploit either the structure of Boolean lattices or the information contained in belief sources. Each has its merits depending on the situation. In this paper, we propose sequences of graphs for the computation of the zeta and M\"obius transformations that optimally exploit both the structure of distributive semilattices and the information contained in belief sources. We call them the Efficient M\"obius Transformations (EMT). We show that the complexity of the EMT is always inferior to the complexity of algorithms that consider the whole lattice, such as the Fast M\"obius Transform (FMT) for all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
