Counting list homomorphisms from graphs of bounded treewidth: tight complexity bounds

TL;DR

This paper establishes exact bounds on the computational complexity of counting list homomorphisms from graphs with bounded treewidth, revealing tight upper and lower bounds based on the structure of the target graph.

Contribution

It provides a complete classification of the counting complexity for list homomorphisms, identifying the precise base of exponential growth depending on the target graph's properties.

Findings

Counting can be done in time irr(H)^t·n^{O(1)}

Counting cannot be improved to (irr(H)-ε)^t·n^{O(1)} unless #SETH fails

The bounds are tight for all target graphs, with or without loops.

Abstract

The goal of this work is to give precise bounds on the counting complexity of a family of generalized coloring problems (list homomorphisms) on bounded-treewidth graphs. Given graphs $G$, $H$, and lists $L(v)\subseteq V(H)$ for every $v\in V(G)$, a {\em list homomorphism} is a function $f:V(G)\to V(H)$ that preserves the edges (i.e., $uv\in E(G)$ implies $f(u)f(v)\in E(H)$) and respects the lists (i.e., $f(v)\in L(v))$. Standard techniques show that if $G$ is given with a tree decomposition of width $t$, then the number of list homomorphisms can be counted in time $|V(H)|^t\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. Our main result is determining, for every fixed graph $H$, how much the base $|V(H)|$ in the running time can be improved. For a connected graph $H$ we define $\operatorname{irr}(H)$ the following way: if $H$ has a loop or is nonbipartite, then $\operatorname{irr}(H)$ is the maximum size of a set $S\subseteq V(H)$ where any two vertices have different neighborhoods; if $H$ is bipartite, then $\operatorname{irr}(H)$ is the maximum size of such a set that is fully in one of the bipartition classes. For disconnected $H$, we define $\operatorname{irr}(H)$ as the maximum of $\operatorname{irr}(C)$ over every connected component $C$ of $H$. We show that, for every fixed graph $H$, the number of list homomorphisms from $(G,L)$ to $H$ * can be counted in time $\operatorname{irr}(H)^t\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ if a tree decomposition of $G$ having width at most $t$ is given in the input, and * cannot be counted in time $(\operatorname{irr}(H)-\epsilon)^t\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ for any $\epsilon>0$, even if a tree decomposition of $G$ having width at most $t$ is given in the input, unless the #SETH fails. Thereby we give a precise and complete complexity classification featuring matching upper and lower bounds for all target graphs with or without loops.