Natural vs. Artificial Topologies on a Relativistic Spacetime
Kyriakos Papadopoulos

TL;DR
This paper critically reviews candidate topologies for relativistic spacetime manifolds, emphasizing the importance of the 'natural topology' concept and examining physical phenomena's dependence on topology choice.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive survey of spacetime topologies, discusses criticisms, and highlights the need for a physically justified 'natural topology' in relativity.
Findings
Critiques the use of manifold topology in spacetime analysis.
Highlights phenomena like the Limit Curve Theorem depend on topology.
Calls for establishing a physically motivated 'natural topology'.
Abstract
Consider a set equipped with a structure . We call a natural topology , on , the topology induced by . For example, a natural topology for a metric space is a topology induced by the metric and for a linearly ordered set a natural topology should be the topology that is induced by the order . This fundamental property, for a topology to be called "natural", has been largely ignored while studying topological properties of spacetime manifolds where is the Lorentz "metric", and the manifold topology has been used as a natural topology, ignoring the spacetime "metric" . In this survey we review critically candidate topologies for a relativistic spacetime manifold, we pose open questions and conjectures with the aim to establish a complete guide on the latest results in the field, and give the foundations for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
