Reactivity of the Si(100)-2$\times$1-Cl surface with respect to PH$_3$, PCl$_3$, and BCl$_3$: Comparison with PH$_3$ on Si(100)-2$\times$1-H
T. V. Pavlova, K. N. Eltsov

TL;DR
This study uses density functional theory to compare the reactivity of Si(100)-2×1-Cl and H surfaces with dopant molecules, revealing chlorine monolayers' potential as a resist for atomic doping with specific molecules.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed theoretical comparison of chlorine monolayer resistance and reactivity with dopant molecules on Si(100) surfaces.
Findings
Cl monolayer increases reactivity towards PH3 compared to H monolayer
Cl monolayer offers high resistance against chlorine-containing molecules
PCl3 and BCl3 are suitable for doping through patterned Cl-resist
Abstract
Despite the interest in a chlorine monolayer on Si(100) as an alternative to hydrogen resist for atomic-precision doping, little is known about its interaction with dopant-containing molecules. We used the density functional theory to evaluate whether a chlorine monolayer on Si(100) is suitable as a resist for \ce{PH3}, \ce{PCl3}, and \ce{BCl3} molecules. We calculated reaction pathways for \ce{PH3}, \ce{PCl3}, and \ce{BCl3} adsorption on a bare and Cl-terminated Si(100)-21 surface, as well as for \ce{PH3} adsorption on H-terminated Si(100)-21, which is widely used in current technologies for atomically precise doping of Si(100) with phosphorus. It was found that the Si(100)-21-Cl surface has a higher reactivity towards phosphine than Si(100)-21-H, and, therefore, unpatterned areas are less protected from undesirable incorporation of \ce{PH3} fragments.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
