Normal Sequences with Non-Maximal Automatic Complexity
Liam Jordon, Philippe Moser

TL;DR
This paper explores the automatic complexity of normal sequences, showing that some can have minimal complexity rates while still being normal, and provides bounds for specific sequences like Champernowne.
Contribution
It demonstrates the existence of normal sequences with minimal automatic complexity rates and establishes upper bounds for the complexity of Champernowne sequences.
Findings
Existence of normal sequences with $I(T)=0$ and $S(T) \\leq 1/2$
Champernowne sequence has $S(C) \\leq 2/3$
Insights into automatic complexity of normal sequences
Abstract
This paper examines Automatic Complexity, a complexity notion introduced by Shallit and Wang in 2001. We demonstrate that there exists a normal sequence such that and , where and are the lower and upper automatic complexity rates of respectively. We furthermore show that there exists a Champernowne sequence , i.e. a sequence formed by concatenating all strings of length followed by concatenating all strings of length and so on, such that .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
