First-Order Logic with Connectivity Operators

TL;DR

This paper introduces new extensions of first-order logic with connectivity and disjoint paths predicates, enabling the expression of complex graph problems like feedback vertex set and disjoint paths, and analyzes their expressive limitations.

Contribution

It proposes separator logic and disjoint-paths logic, extending first-order logic to express connectivity and disjoint paths, and compares their expressive power with existing logics.

Findings

Separator logic can express problems like feedback vertex set.

Disjoint-paths logic can express disjoint paths and minor containment.

Disjoint-paths logic cannot express planarity.

Abstract

First-order logic (FO) can express many algorithmic problems on graphs, such as the independent set and dominating set problem, parameterized by solution size. On the other hand, FO cannot express the very simple algorithmic question of whether two vertices are connected. We enrich FO with connectivity predicates that are tailored to express algorithmic graph properties that are commonly studied in parameterized algorithmics. By adding the atomic predicates $conn_k (x, y, z_1 ,\ldots, z_k)$ that hold true in a graph if there exists a path between (the valuations of) $x$ and $y$ after (the valuations of) $z_1,\ldots,z_k$ have been deleted, we obtain separator logic $FO + conn$. We show that separator logic can express many interesting problems such as the feedback vertex set problem and elimination distance problems to first-order definable classes. We then study the limitations of separator logic and prove that it cannot express planarity, and, in particular, not the disjoint paths problem. We obtain the stronger disjoint-paths logic $FO + DP$ by adding the atomic predicates $disjoint-paths_k [(x_1, y_1 ),\ldots , (x_k , y_k )]$ that evaluate to true if there are internally vertex disjoint paths between (the valuations of) $x_i$ and $y_i$ for all $1 \le i \le k$. Disjoint-paths logic can express the disjoint paths problem, the problem of (topological) minor containment, the problem of hitting (topological) minors, and many more. Finally, we compare the expressive power of the new logics with that of transitive closure logics and monadic second-order logic.