Multi-epoch properties of the warm absorber in the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 985
J. Ebrero (1), V. Domcek (2, 3, 4), G. A. Kriss (5), J. S. Kaastra, (6, 7) ((1) Telespazio UK for ESA European Space Agency, (2) API Amsterdam,, (3) GRAPPA, (4) Masaryk University, (5) STScI, (6) SRON Netherlands Institute, for Space Research, (7) Leiden University)

TL;DR
This study analyzes multi-epoch X-ray spectra of NGC 985 to characterize its warm absorbers, revealing their properties, variability, and potential impact on galaxy feedback mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides a detailed multi-epoch analysis of warm absorber components in NGC 985, including their ionization, kinematics, and response to flux changes, which was not previously characterized.
Findings
Up to four warm absorber components identified with varying ionization and velocities.
The fastest component accounts for significant kinetic energy, potentially influencing galaxy feedback.
Absorber components are located at pc-scale distances, with some extending up to tens of parsecs.
Abstract
(Abridged) NGC 985 was observed by XMM-Newton twice in 2015, revealing that the source was coming out from a soft X-ray obscuration event that took place in 2013. These kinds of events are possibly recurrent since a previous XMM-Newton archival observation in 2003 also showed signatures of partial obscuration. We have analyzed the high-resolution X-ray spectra of NGC 985 obtained by the RGS in 2003, 2013, and 2015 in order to characterize the ionized absorbers superimposed to the continuum and to study their response as the ionizing flux varies. We found that up to four warm absorber (WA) components were present in the grating spectra of NGC 985, plus a mildy ionized (log xi ranging between 0.2 and 0.5) obscuring (log N(H) of about 22.3) wind outflowing at about 6000 km/s. The absorbers have a log N(H) ranging from 21 to about 22.5, and ionization parameters ranging from 1.6 to 2.9. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
