First direct measurement of $^{59}$Cu(p,$\alpha$)$^{56}$Ni: A step towards constraining the Ni-Cu cycle in the Cosmos
J.S. Randhawa, R. Kanungo, J. Refsgaard, P. Mohr, T. Ahn, M. Alcorta,, C. Andreoiu, S. S.Bhattacharjee, B. Davids, G. Christian, A. A. Chen, R., Coleman, P. Garrett, G. F. Grinyer, E.Gyabeng Fuakye, G. Hackman, R. Jain, K., Kapoor, R. Kr\"ucken, A. Laffoley, A. Lennarz, J.Liang

TL;DR
This study presents the first direct measurement of the $^{59}$Cu(p,$ extalpha$)$^{56}$Ni reaction, providing crucial data to refine models of nucleosynthesis in supernovae and X-ray bursts, and suggesting the $ u p$-process can operate at higher temperatures.
Contribution
First direct measurement of the $^{59}$Cu(p,$ extalpha$)$^{56}$Ni reaction rate, challenging theoretical predictions and impacting nucleosynthesis models in astrophysical environments.
Findings
Reaction proceeds mainly to the ground state of $^{56}$Ni.
Experimental rate is lower than theoretical predictions.
Results imply the $ u p$-process can occur at higher temperatures.
Abstract
Reactions on the proton-rich nuclides drive the nucleosynthesis in Core-Collapse Supernovae (CCSNe) and in X-ray bursts (XRBs). CCSNe eject the nucleosynthesis products to the interstellar medium and hence are a potential inventory of p-nuclei, whereas in XRBs nucleosynthesis powers the light curves. In both astrophysical sites the Ni-Cu cycle, which features a competition between Cu(p,)Ni and Cu(p,)Zn, could potentially halt the production of heavier elements. Here, we report the first direct measurement of Cu(p,)Ni using a re-accelerated Cu beam and cryogenic solid hydrogen target. Our results show that the reaction proceeds predominantly to the ground state of Ni and the experimental rate has been found to be lower than Hauser-Feshbach-based statistical predictions. New results hint that the $\nu…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
