TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel dataset and multi-stage learning model for legal judgment prediction in real court settings, leveraging genuine case inputs and multi-role dialogues to improve accuracy and interpretability.
Contribution
It presents a new dataset from real courtrooms and a multi-task learning approach that incorporates case lifecycle information for more accurate legal judgment prediction.
Findings
Significant accuracy improvements over state-of-the-art baselines
Enhanced interpretability of neural predictions through case dialogue analysis
User study shows improved trial efficiency and judgment quality
Abstract
Legal judgment prediction(LJP) is an essential task for legal AI. While prior methods studied on this topic in a pseudo setting by employing the judge-summarized case narrative as the input to predict the judgment, neglecting critical case life-cycle information in real court setting could threaten the case logic representation quality and prediction correctness. In this paper, we introduce a novel challenging dataset from real courtrooms to predict the legal judgment in a reasonably encyclopedic manner by leveraging the genuine input of the case -- plaintiff's claims and court debate data, from which the case's facts are automatically recognized by comprehensively understanding the multi-role dialogues of the court debate, and then learnt to discriminate the claims so as to reach the final judgment through multi-task learning. An extensive set of experiments with a large civil trial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
