TL;DR
This study compares two different free energy calculation methods, ATM and PMF, in predicting host-guest binding affinities within the SAMPL8 challenge, demonstrating their high accuracy and agreement with experimental data.
Contribution
The paper introduces and validates the ATM method alongside the established PMF approach, showing their consistent results and agreement with experimental binding affinities.
Findings
ATM and PMF methods agree closely in predictions
Both methods show high correlation with experimental data
Results validate the ATM protocol for future complex systems
Abstract
We report the results of our participation in the SAMPL8 GDCC Blind Challenge for host-guest binding affinity predictions. Absolute binding affinity prediction is of central importance to the biophysics of molecular association and pharmaceutical discovery. The blinded SAMPL series have provided an important forum for assessing the reliability of binding free energy methods in an objective way. In this blinded challenge, we employed two binding free energy methods, the newly developed alchemical transfer method (ATM) and the well-established potential of mean force (PMF) physical pathway method, using the same setup and force field model. The calculated binding free energies from the two methods are in excellent quantitative agreement. Importantly, the results from the two methods were also found to agree well with the experimental binding affinities released subsequently, with an …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
