SGD: The Role of Implicit Regularization, Batch-size and Multiple-epochs

TL;DR

This paper investigates the theoretical underpinnings of SGD in convex optimization, challenging the implicit regularization explanation, and demonstrates how multiple epochs can improve learning outcomes, with implications for deep learning.

Contribution

It provides theoretical separations between SGD and other methods, showing multiple epochs can outperform single-pass SGD and refutes implicit regularization as the sole explanation for SGD's success.

Findings

Implicit regularization does not always explain SGD's success.

Multiple epochs can significantly improve learning in certain problems.

SGD can outperform regularized empirical risk minimization in some settings.

Abstract

Multi-epoch, small-batch, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has been the method of choice for learning with large over-parameterized models. A popular theory for explaining why SGD works well in practice is that the algorithm has an implicit regularization that biases its output towards a good solution. Perhaps the theoretically most well understood learning setting for SGD is that of Stochastic Convex Optimization (SCO), where it is well known that SGD learns at a rate of $O(1/\sqrt{n})$, where $n$ is the number of samples. In this paper, we consider the problem of SCO and explore the role of implicit regularization, batch size and multiple epochs for SGD. Our main contributions are threefold: (a) We show that for any regularizer, there is an SCO problem for which Regularized Empirical Risk Minimzation fails to learn. This automatically rules out any implicit regularization based explanation for the success of SGD. (b) We provide a separation between SGD and learning via Gradient Descent on empirical loss (GD) in terms of sample complexity. We show that there is an SCO problem such that GD with any step size and number of iterations can only learn at a suboptimal rate: at least $\widetilde{\Omega}(1/n^{5/12})$. (c) We present a multi-epoch variant of SGD commonly used in practice. We prove that this algorithm is at least as good as single pass SGD in the worst case. However, for certain SCO problems, taking multiple passes over the dataset can significantly outperform single pass SGD. We extend our results to the general learning setting by showing a problem which is learnable for any data distribution, and for this problem, SGD is strictly better than RERM for any regularization function. We conclude by discussing the implications of our results for deep learning, and show a separation between SGD and ERM for two layer diagonal neural networks.