TL;DR
This paper identifies and characterizes social catalysts on Facebook, individuals who facilitate conversations among others, revealing their significant impact despite not having distinct network structures.
Contribution
The study introduces a behavioral measure of social catalystness, demonstrating its predictive power and highlighting a previously underexplored social role in online networks.
Findings
Top 1% of catalysts account for 31% of interactions
Catalystness is predicted by conversation-promoting behaviors
Social catalysts are not distinguished by network structure
Abstract
People assume different and important roles within social networks. Some roles have received extensive study: that of influencers who are well-connected, and that of brokers who bridge unconnected parts of the network. However, very little work has explored another potentially important role, that of creating opportunities for people to interact and facilitating conversation between them. These individuals bring people together and act as social catalysts. In this paper, we test for the presence of social catalysts on the online social network Facebook. We first identify posts that have spurred conversations between the poster's friends and summarize the characteristics of such posts. We then aggregate the number of catalyzed comments at the poster level, as a measure of the individual's "catalystness." The top 1% of such individuals account for 31% of catalyzed interactions, although…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
