The Parkes pulsar timing array second data release: Timing analysis
D. J. Reardon, R. M. Shannon, A. D. Cameron, B. Goncharov, G. B., Hobbs, H. Middleton, M. Shamohammadi, N. Thyagarajan, M. Bailes, N. D. R., Bhat, S. Dai, M. Kerr, R. N. Manchester, C. J. Russell, R. Spiewak, J. B., Wang, X. J. Zhu

TL;DR
This paper presents a detailed timing analysis of 25 pulsars from the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, detecting Shapiro delay and parallax, and providing precise measurements of pulsar masses and distances to aid gravitational wave detection.
Contribution
The study reports the first detection of Shapiro delay in four pulsars and measures parallax in six, extending the pulsar data set with legacy data for improved gravitational wave search.
Findings
First detection of Shapiro delay in four pulsars
Parallax measured in six pulsars
Precise distance measurement to PSR J1909-3744
Abstract
The main goal of pulsar timing array experiments is to detect correlated signals such as nanohertz-frequency gravitational waves. Pulsar timing data collected in dense monitoring campaigns can also be used to study the stars themselves, their binary companions, and the intervening ionised interstellar medium. Timing observations are extraordinarily sensitive to changes in path length between the pulsar and the Earth, enabling precise measurements of the pulsar positions, distances and velocities, and the shapes of their orbits. Here we present a timing analysis of 25 pulsars observed as part of the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA) project over time spans of up to 24 yr. The data are from the second data release of the PPTA, which we have extended by including legacy data. We make the first detection of Shapiro delay in four Southern pulsars (PSRs J10177156, J11256014,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
