Interplanetary Shock-induced Magnetopause Motion: Comparison between Theory and Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations
Ravindra T. Desai, Mervyn P. Freeman, Jonathan P. Eastwood, Joseph. W., B. Eggington, Martin. O. Archer, Yuri Shprits, Nigel P. Meredith, Frances A., Staples, I. Jonathan Rae, Heli Hietala, Lars Mejnertsen, Jeremy P., Chittenden, Richard B. Horne

TL;DR
This study combines theoretical models and global magnetohydrodynamic simulations to analyze how interplanetary shocks influence Earth's magnetopause motion, revealing distinct response phases and oscillation characteristics relevant to space weather prediction.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison between theoretical predictions and simulation results of magnetopause response to shocks, highlighting differences in oscillation amplitudes and damping.
Findings
Magnetopause response has three phases: acceleration, compression, and oscillation.
Simulations predict larger oscillation amplitudes and weaker damping than theory.
The results explain observed magnetopause oscillations after major interplanetary shocks.
Abstract
The magnetopause marks the outer edge of the Earth's magnetosphere and a distinct boundary between solar wind and magnetospheric plasma populations. In this letter, we use global magnetohydrodynamic simulations to examine the response of the terrestrial magnetopause to fast-forward interplanetary shocks of various strengths and compare to theoretical predictions. The theory and simulations indicate the magnetopause response can be characterised by three distinct phases; an initial acceleration as inertial forces are overcome, a rapid compressive phase comprising the majority of the distance travelled, and large-scale damped oscillations with amplitudes of the order of an Earth radius. The two approaches agree in predicting subsolar magnetopause oscillations with frequencies 2-13 mHz but the simulations notably predict larger amplitudes and weaker damping rates. This phenomenon is of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
