TL;DR
This paper models how viral mutations and containment policies influence the evolution of viruses like COVID-19, revealing that policy design can inadvertently favor more evasive variants and that long-term effects are hard to predict from short-term data.
Contribution
It introduces an epidemiological model incorporating stochastic mutations and antigenic drift, analyzing how containment strategies affect viral evolution and long-term dynamics.
Findings
Containment policies influence viral evolution direction.
High mutation propensity can lead to indefinite circulation.
Short-term success may mask long-term risks.
Abstract
How will the novel coronavirus evolve? I study a simple epidemiological model, in which mutations may change the properties of the virus and its associated disease stochastically and antigenic drifts allow new variants to partially evade immunity. I show analytically that variants with higher infectiousness, longer disease duration, and shorter latent period prove to be fitter. "Smart" containment policies targeting symptomatic individuals may redirect the evolution of the virus, as they give an edge to variants with a longer incubation period and a higher share of asymptomatic infections. Reduced mortality, on the other hand, does not per se prove to be an evolutionary advantage. I then implement this model as an agent-based simulation model in order to explore its aggregate dynamics. Monte Carlo simulations show that a) containment policy design has an impact on both speed and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
