Passive sub-ambient cooling: radiative cooling versus evaporative cooling
Ablimit Aili, Xiaobo Yin, Ronggui Yang

TL;DR
This study compares passive radiative and evaporative cooling methods under various weather conditions, highlighting their respective advantages and limitations for sustainable, energy-free cooling solutions.
Contribution
It provides experimental and theoretical insights into the performance of radiative and evaporative coolers under different humidity and temperature conditions.
Findings
Evaporative cooling performs better in high-temperature, low-humidity conditions.
Radiative cooling is more resilient in high-humidity, low-temperature environments.
Both cooling methods can be used complementarily depending on weather and water availability.
Abstract
Day-and-night radiative sky cooling has emerged as a potential alternative to conventional cooling technologies such as refrigeration-based air conditioning and evaporative wet cooling. Both radiative cooling and evaporative cooling can passively achieve sub-ambient cooling without consuming electricity. Although both cooling techniques are subject to impacts from various weather conditions, the extents of the impacts under the same conditions are not well understood. In this work, we experimentally and theoretically study the thermal performances of a passive radiative cooler and a passive evaporative cooler when exposed to a clear night sky. We show that evaporative cooling is better suited for high-temperature and low-humidity weather conditions, with the measured sub-ambient temperatures of the radiative and evaporative coolers being -13.5{\deg}C and -15.0{\deg}C, respectively, at a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
