Lattice thermal conductivity of half-Heuslers with density functional theory and machine learning: Enhancing predictivity by active sampling with principal component analysis
Rasmus Tran{\aa}s, Ole Martin L{\o}vvik, Oliver Tomic and, Kristian Berland

TL;DR
This paper explores how machine learning, combined with active sampling and principal component analysis, can efficiently predict low lattice thermal conductivity in half-Heusler compounds, reducing computational costs and improving accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces an active learning approach with PCA to enhance machine learning predictions of lattice thermal conductivity, addressing the challenge of rare, distinct compounds.
Findings
Active learning improves prediction accuracy for low thermal conductivity compounds.
PCA-based feature selection enhances model performance.
Active learning without DFT features offers a faster sampling method.
Abstract
Low lattice thermal conductivity is essential for high thermoelectric performance of a material. Lattice thermal conductivity is often computed using density functional theory (DFT), typically at a high computational cost. Training machine learning models to predict lattice thermal conductivity could offer an effective procedure to identify low lattice thermal conductivity compounds. However, in doing so, we must face the fact that such compounds can be quite rare and distinct from those in a typical training set. This distinctness can be problematic as standard machine learning methods are inaccurate when predicting properties of compounds with features differing significantly from those in the training set. By computing the lattice thermal conductivity of 122 half-Heusler compounds, using the temperature-dependent effective potential method, we generate a data set to explore this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
