Search for High-Energy Neutrinos from Ultra-Luminous Infrared Galaxies with IceCube
IceCube Collaboration: R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A., Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, C. Alispach, A. A. Alves Jr., N. M. Amin, R., An, K. Andeen, T. Anderson, G. Anton, C. Arg\"uelles, Y. Ashida, S. Axani, X., Bai, A. Balagopal V., A. Barbano, S. W. Barwick

TL;DR
This study searches for high-energy neutrinos from ultra-luminous infrared galaxies using 7.5 years of IceCube data, setting upper limits on neutrino fluxes and constraining their contribution to the diffuse astrophysical neutrino background.
Contribution
First comprehensive stacking analysis of 75 ULIRGs with IceCube, providing upper limits on neutrino emission and constraining their role in the diffuse neutrino flux.
Findings
No significant neutrino signal detected from ULIRGs.
Established upper limits on neutrino flux from ULIRGs.
Constrained ULIRGs' contribution to the diffuse neutrino background.
Abstract
Ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) have infrared luminosities , making them the most luminous objects in the infrared sky. These dusty objects are generally powered by starbursts with star-formation rates that exceed , possibly combined with a contribution from an active galactic nucleus. Such environments make ULIRGs plausible sources of astrophysical high-energy neutrinos, which can be observed by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole. We present a stacking search for high-energy neutrinos from a representative sample of 75 ULIRGs with redshift using 7.5 years of IceCube data. The results are consistent with a background-only observation, yielding upper limits on the neutrino flux from these 75 ULIRGs. For an unbroken power-law spectrum, we report an upper limit on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
