Comments on the determination of the conductivity at the boundary from the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map
Mourad Choulli

TL;DR
This paper revisits the stability of boundary conductivity determination from the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map, clarifying existing proofs and discussing implications without presenting new primary results.
Contribution
It clarifies and comments on existing methods for boundary conductivity determination, providing insights and consequences of stability inequalities.
Findings
Clarification of proof techniques for boundary conductivity determination.
Discussion of implications of stability inequalities.
Comparison of singular and localized oscillating solutions methods.
Abstract
We revisit the stability issue of determining the conductivity at the boundary from the corresponding Dirichlet-to-Neumann map. We discuss both the method based on singular solutions and the one built on the localized oscillating solutions. Our primary objective is not establishing new results on this subject even if the present work contains some new ones. We mainly clarify some points in the existing proofs and make some comments. We also derive some consequences of the stability inequality of the determination of the conductivity at the boundary from the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNumerical methods in inverse problems · Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering · Composite Material Mechanics
