Budgeted Dominating Sets in Uncertain Graphs

TL;DR

This paper investigates the computational complexity and approximation algorithms for the Probabilistic Budgeted Dominating Set problem in uncertain graphs, revealing NP-hardness, parameterized hardness, and efficient solutions in special cases.

Contribution

It establishes the NP-completeness of PBDS on trees, explores its parameterized complexity, and provides approximation schemes and exact algorithms for specific graph classes.

Findings

PBDS is NP-complete on trees of diameter at most four.

PBDS is W[1]-hard for the budget parameter k.

A PTAS exists for PBDS on trees with (1-ε) approximation.

Abstract

We study the {\em Budgeted Dominating Set} (BDS) problem on uncertain graphs, namely, graphs with a probability distribution $p$ associated with the edges, such that an edge $e$ exists in the graph with probability $p(e)$. The input to the problem consists of a vertex-weighted uncertain graph $\G=(V, E, p, \omega)$ and an integer {\em budget} (or {\em solution size}) $k$, and the objective is to compute a vertex set $S$ of size $k$ that maximizes the expected total domination (or total weight) of vertices in the closed neighborhood of $S$. We refer to the problem as the {\em Probabilistic Budgeted Dominating Set}~(PBDS) problem and present the following results. \begin{enumerate} \dnsitem We show that the PBDS problem is NP-complete even when restricted to uncertain {\em trees} of diameter at most four. This is in sharp contrast with the well-known fact that the BDS problem is solvable in polynomial time in trees. We further show that PBDS is \wone-hard for the budget parameter $k$, and under the {\em Exponential time hypothesis} it cannot be solved in $n^{o(k)}$ time. \item We show that if one is willing to settle for $(1-\epsilon)$ approximation, then there exists a PTAS for PBDS on trees. Moreover, for the scenario of uniform edge-probabilities, the problem can be solved optimally in polynomial time. \item We consider the parameterized complexity of the PBDS problem, and show that Uni-PBDS (where all edge probabilities are identical) is \wone-hard for the parameter pathwidth. On the other hand, we show that it is FPT in the combined parameters of the budget $k$ and the treewidth. \item Finally, we extend some of our parameterized results to planar and apex-minor-free graphs. \end{enumerate}