Twin-width and polynomial kernels
\'Edouard Bonnet, Eun Jung Kim, Amadeus Reinald, St\'ephan Thomass\'e,, R\'emi Watrigant

TL;DR
This paper explores the limits of polynomial kernels for certain problems on graphs with bounded twin-width, establishing lower bounds for some problems and providing polynomial kernels for others, along with efficient algorithms for graphs of twin-width 1.
Contribution
It proves that polynomial kernels for k-Dominating Set on graphs with twin-width at most 4 are unlikely, and offers new polynomial kernels for Connected and Capacitated k-Vertex Cover.
Findings
Polynomial kernel for k-Dominating Set unlikely on graphs with twin-width ≤ 4.
Quadratic vertex kernel for Connected k-Vertex Cover on bounded twin-width graphs.
Deciding twin-width ≤ 1 can be done in polynomial time, enabling efficient solutions for many problems.
Abstract
We study the existence of polynomial kernels, for parameterized problems without a polynomial kernel on general graphs, when restricted to graphs of bounded twin-width. Our main result is that a polynomial kernel for -Dominating Set on graphs of twin-width at most 4 would contradict a standard complexity-theoretic assumption. The reduction is quite involved, especially to get the twin-width upper bound down to 4, and can be tweaked to work for Connected -Dominating Set and Total -Dominating Set (albeit with a worse upper bound on the twin-width). The -Independent Set problem admits the same lower bound by a much simpler argument, previously observed [ICALP '21], which extends to -Independent Dominating Set, -Path, -Induced Path, -Induced Matching, etc. On the positive side, we obtain a simple quadratic vertex kernel for Connected -Vertex Cover and Capacitated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
