The most luminous blue quasars at 3.0<z<3.3. II. CIV/X-ray emission and accretion disc physics
Elisabeta Lusso, Emanuele Nardini, Susanna Bisogni, Guido Risaliti,, Roberto Gilli, Gordon T. Richards, Francesco Salvestrini, Cristian Vignali,, Giada Bargiacchi, Francesca Civano, Martin Elvis, Giuseppina Fabbiano,, Alessandro Marconi, Andrea Sacchi, Matilde Signorini

TL;DR
This study investigates the connection between CIV emission line properties and X-ray emission in bright quasars at z~3, revealing intrinsic X-ray weakness linked to accretion disc and wind physics, with implications for their use in cosmology.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the origin of X-ray weakness in quasars, suggesting a starved corona due to disc winds affects their emission properties.
Findings
X-ray weak quasars show a correlation between CIV EW and X-ray flux.
No clear relation between 2-10 keV luminosity and CIV peak velocity.
X-ray weakness may result from a starved corona caused by disc winds.
Abstract
We analyse the properties of the CIV broad emission line in connection with the X-ray emission of 30 bright SDSS quasars at z~3.0-3.3 with pointed XMM-Newton observations, which were selected to test the suitability of AGN as cosmological tools. In our previous work, we found that a large fraction (~25%) of the quasars in this sample are X-ray underluminous by factors of >3-10. As absorbing columns of >10 cm can be safely ruled out, their weakness is most likely intrinsic. Here we explore possible correlations between the UV and X-ray features of these sources to investigate the origin of X-ray weakness. We fit their UV SDSS spectra and analyse their CIV properties (e.g., equivalent width, EW; line peak velocity, ) as a function of the X-ray photon index and 2-10 keV flux. We confirm the trends of CIV and EW with UV luminosity at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
