Understanding Physics: 'What?', 'Why?', and 'How?'
Mario Hubert

TL;DR
This paper explores three forms of scientific understanding—what, why, and how—emphasizing understanding-how through mechanistic explanations, and applies these concepts to thermodynamics and entropy case studies.
Contribution
It introduces a framework distinguishing understanding-what, understanding-why, and understanding-how, highlighting the depth of mechanistic explanations in scientific comprehension.
Findings
Understanding-how is a deeper form of understanding based on mechanistic explanations.
The framework clarifies different types of scientific understanding.
Application to thermodynamics illustrates the practical relevance of the distinctions.
Abstract
I want to combine two hitherto largely independent research projects, scientific understanding and mechanistic explanations. Understanding is not only achieved by answering why-questions, that is, by providing scientific explanations, but also by answering what-questions, that is, by providing what I call scientific descriptions. Based on this distinction, I develop three forms of understanding: understanding-what, understanding-why, and understanding-how. I argue that understanding-how is a particularly deep form of understanding, because it is based on mechanistic explanations, which answer why something happens in virtue of what it is made of. I apply the three forms of understanding to two case studies: first, to the historical development of thermodynamics and, second, to the differences between the Clausius and the Boltzmann entropy in explaining thermodynamic processes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
