TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel unsupervised method for visual place recognition that estimates environment- and place-specific utility of visual features, leading to improved accuracy and efficiency on benchmark datasets.
Contribution
It presents a dual utility estimation approach using contrastive learning for VLAD clusters, enhancing VPR performance and interpretability.
Findings
Achieves state-of-the-art results on benchmark datasets.
Reduces storage and computation requirements.
Finer-grained utility categorization improves recognition accuracy.
Abstract
Visual Place Recognition (VPR) approaches have typically attempted to match places by identifying visual cues, image regions or landmarks that have high ``utility'' in identifying a specific place. But this concept of utility is not singular - rather it can take a range of forms. In this paper, we present a novel approach to deduce two key types of utility for VPR: the utility of visual cues `specific' to an environment, and to a particular place. We employ contrastive learning principles to estimate both the environment- and place-specific utility of Vector of Locally Aggregated Descriptors (VLAD) clusters in an unsupervised manner, which is then used to guide local feature matching through keypoint selection. By combining these two utility measures, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on three challenging benchmark datasets, while simultaneously reducing the required…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsContrastive Learning
