The Observed Evolution of the Stellar Mass - Halo Mass Relation for Brightest Central Galaxies
Jesse B. Golden-Marx, C. J. Miller, Y. Zhang, R. L. C. Ogando, A., Palmese, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, S. Allam, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Annis,, D. Bacon, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, A. Carnero Rosell, M., Carrasco Kind, F. J. Castander, M. Constanzi, M. Crocce

TL;DR
This study investigates the evolution of the stellar mass-halo mass relation for brightest central galaxies over redshift, revealing significant parameter changes and suggesting intra-cluster light growth, with partial agreement from cosmological simulations.
Contribution
It introduces the inclusion of the magnitude gap as a third parameter in the SMHM relation, improving precision and revealing evolutionary trends not captured by simulations.
Findings
Negative evolution in the SMHM relation's slope
Negative evolution in the stretch parameter
Positive evolution in the offset parameter
Abstract
We quantify evolution in the cluster scale stellar mass - halo mass (SMHM) relation's parameters using 2323 clusters and brightest central galaxies (BCGs) over the redshift range . The precision on inferred SMHM parameters is improved by including the magnitude gap () between the BCG and fourth brightest cluster member (M14) as a third parameter in the SMHM relation. At fixed halo mass, accounting for , through a stretch parameter, reduces the SMHM relation's intrinsic scatter. To explore this redshift range, we use clusters, BCGs, and cluster members identified using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey C4 and redMaPPer cluster catalogs and the Dark Energy Survey redMaPPer catalog. Through this joint analysis, we detect no systematic differences in BCG stellar mass, , and cluster mass (inferred from richness) between the datsets. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
