A Comparison of the Delta Method and the Bootstrap in Deep Learning Classification
Geir K. Nilsen, Antonella Z. Munthe-Kaas, Hans J. Skaug and, Morten Brun

TL;DR
This paper compares the Delta method and Bootstrap for quantifying predictive uncertainty in deep learning classifiers, showing a strong correlation and significant computational efficiency of the Delta method.
Contribution
It validates the Delta method against Bootstrap in deep learning, demonstrating comparable results with much faster computation.
Findings
Strong linear relationship between the two methods' uncertainty estimates
Delta method reduces computation time by a factor of five
Applicable to LeNet-based classifiers on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets
Abstract
We validate the recently introduced deep learning classification adapted Delta method by a comparison with the classical Bootstrap. We show that there is a strong linear relationship between the quantified predictive epistemic uncertainty levels obtained from the two methods when applied on two LeNet-based neural network classifiers using the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the Delta method offers a five times computation time reduction compared to the Bootstrap.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Machine Learning and Data Classification · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
