Supervised Off-Policy Ranking

TL;DR

This paper introduces supervised off-policy ranking (SOPR), a new approach that uses supervised learning with off-policy data to rank policies effectively, focusing on comparison rather than precise performance estimation.

Contribution

The paper proposes a hierarchical Transformer-based model for SOPR that learns to rank policies by minimizing a ranking loss, shifting from performance estimation to policy comparison.

Findings

Outperforms baselines in rank correlation

Achieves lower regret values

Demonstrates improved stability

Abstract

Off-policy evaluation (OPE) is to evaluate a target policy with data generated by other policies. Most previous OPE methods focus on precisely estimating the true performance of a policy. We observe that in many applications, (1) the end goal of OPE is to compare two or multiple candidate policies and choose a good one, which is a much simpler task than precisely evaluating their true performance; and (2) there are usually multiple policies that have been deployed to serve users in real-world systems and thus the true performance of these policies can be known. Inspired by the two observations, in this work, we study a new problem, supervised off-policy ranking (SOPR), which aims to rank a set of target policies based on supervised learning by leveraging off-policy data and policies with known performance. We propose a method to solve SOPR, which learns a policy scoring model by minimizing a ranking loss of the training policies rather than estimating the precise policy performance. The scoring model in our method, a hierarchical Transformer based model, maps a set of state-action pairs to a score, where the state of each pair comes from the off-policy data and the action is taken by a target policy on the state in an offline manner. Extensive experiments on public datasets show that our method outperforms baseline methods in terms of rank correlation, regret value, and stability. Our code is publicly available at GitHub.