Simulating NEMA characteristics of the modular total-body J-PET scanner -- an economic total-body PET from plastic scintillators
Pawe{\l} Moskal, Pawe{\l} Kowalski, Roman Shopa, Lech Raczy\'nski,, Jakub Baran, Neha Chug, Catalina Curceanu, Eryk Czerwi\'nski, Meysam Dadgar,, Kamil Dulski, Aleksander Gajos, Beatrix Hiesmayr, Krzysztof Kacprzak,, {\L}ukasz Kap{\l}on, Daria Kisielewska, Konrad Klimaszewski

TL;DR
This study simulates the performance of an economical total-body PET scanner made from plastic scintillators, showing comparable image quality and significantly improved sensitivity and NECR over standard systems, promising broad clinical use.
Contribution
It introduces a novel simulation of a cost-effective total-body PET scanner using plastic scintillators, with performance metrics comparable to state-of-the-art systems.
Findings
Spatial resolution of 3.7 mm (transversal) and 4.9 mm (axial) for 200 cm AFOV.
NECR peak of 630 kcps at 30 kBq/cc activity concentration.
Sensitivity increase by a factor of 12.6 to 38 compared to standard PET systems.
Abstract
The purpose of the presented research is estimation of the performance characteristics of the economic Total-Body Jagiellonian-PET system (TB-J-PET) constructed from plastic scintillators. The characteristics are estimated according to the NEMA NU-2-2018 standards utilizing the GATE package. The simulated detector consists of 24 modules, each built out of 32 plastic scintillator strips (each with cross section of 6 mm times 30 mm and length of 140 cm or 200 cm) arranged in two layers in regular 24-sided polygon circumscribing a circle with the diameter of 78.6 cm. For the TB-J-PET with an axial field-of-view (AFOV) of 200 cm, a spatial resolutions of 3.7 mm (transversal) and 4.9 mm (axial) are achieved. The NECR peak of 630 kcps is expected at 30 kBq/cc activity concentration and the sensitivity at the center amounts to 38 cps/kBq. The SF is estimated to 36.2 %. The values of SF and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
