Envelopes of equivalent martingale measures and a generalized no-arbitrage principle in a finite setting
Andrea Cinfrignini, Davide Petturiti, Barbara Vantaggi

TL;DR
This paper characterizes the lower envelope of equivalent martingale measures in a finite market, introduces a belief function framework to model market frictions and uncertainty, and proposes a generalized no-arbitrage pricing rule.
Contribution
It introduces a belief function approach to characterize martingale measures and formulates a generalized no-arbitrage principle in finite markets with uncertainty.
Findings
The lower envelope of martingale measures is a belief function.
A generalized no-arbitrage condition is established under partial uncertainty.
A new arbitrage-free lower pricing rule is derived.
Abstract
We consider a one-period market model composed by a risk-free asset and a risky asset with possible future values (namely, a -nomial market model). We characterize the lower envelope of the class of equivalent martingale measures in such market model, showing that it is a belief function, obtained as the strict convex combination of two necessity measures. Then, we reformulate a general one-period pricing problem in the framework of belief functions: this allows to model frictions in the market and can be justified in terms of partially resolving uncertainty according to Jaffray. We provide a generalized no-arbitrage condition for a generic one-period market model under partially resolving uncertainty and show that the "risk-neutral" belief function arising in the one-period -nomial market model does not satisfy such condition. Finally, we derive a generalized arbitrage-free…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Portfolio Optimization · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
