Linear Discrepancy is $\Pi_2$-Hard to Approximate
Pasin Manurangsi

TL;DR
This paper proves that approximating the linear discrepancy of a matrix within a certain factor is computationally very hard, specifically $ ext{Pi}_2$-hard, strengthening previous NP-hardness results and establishing $ ext{Pi}_2$-completeness.
Contribution
It establishes the $ ext{Pi}_2$-completeness of approximating linear discrepancy, answering an open question and strengthening prior NP-hardness results.
Findings
Approximating linear discrepancy within $9/8 - ext{epsilon}$ is $ ext{Pi}_2$-hard.
The problem is $ ext{Pi}_2$-complete to approximate.
Strengthens previous NP-hardness results for the problem.
Abstract
In this note, we prove that the problem of computing the linear discrepancy of a given matrix is -hard, even to approximate within factor for any . This strengthens the NP-hardness result of Li and Nikolov [ESA 2020] for the exact version of the problem, and answers a question posed by them. Furthermore, since Li and Nikolov showed that the problem is contained in , our result makes linear discrepancy another natural problem that is -complete (to approximate).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Approximation and Integration · Digital Image Processing Techniques · Analytic Number Theory Research
