On the Use of Field RR Lyrae as Galactic Probes. V. Optical and radial velocity curve templates
V.F. Braga (1,2), J. Crestani (1,3,4), M. Fabrizio (1,2), G. Bono, (1,4), G.W. Preston (5), C. Sneden (6), J. Storm (7), S. Kamann (8), M., Latour (9), H. Lala (10), B. Lemasle (10), Z. Prudil (11), G. Altavilla, (1,2), B. Chaboyer (12), M. Dall'Ora (13), I. Ferraro (1)

TL;DR
This paper presents extensive spectroscopic data and new analytical radial velocity curve templates for RR Lyrae stars, improving velocity measurements and providing insights into their use as galactic probes.
Contribution
It introduces new RVC templates based on a large spectroscopic catalog and addresses the reference epoch problem, enhancing velocity accuracy for RR Lyrae stars.
Findings
RVC templates anchored to mean RV phase reduce residuals by 30-45%.
Barycentric velocities using these templates are 2-3 times more accurate.
Application to NGC 3201 yields a consistent cluster barycentric RV.
Abstract
We collected the largest spectroscopic catalog of RR Lyrae (RRLs) including 20,000 high-, medium- and low-resolution spectra for 10,000 RRLs. We provide the analytical forms of radial velocity curve (RVC) templates. These were built using 36 RRLs (31 fundamental -- split into three period bins -- and 5 first overtone pulsators) with well-sampled RVCs based on three groups of metallic lines (Fe, Mg, Na) and four Balmer lines (H, H, H, H). We tackled the long-standing problem of the reference epoch to anchor light curve and RVC templates. For the -band, we found that the residuals of the templates anchored to the phase of the mean magnitude along the rising branch are 35\% to 45\% smaller than those anchored to the phase of maximum light. For the RVC, we used two independent reference epochs for metallic and Balmer…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
