The mass-metallicity relation at z~1-2 and its dependence on star formation rate
Alaina Henry, Marc Rafelski, Ben Sunnquist, Norbert Pirzkal, Camilla, Pacifici, Hakim Atek, Micaela Bagley, Ivano Baronchelli, Guillermo Barro,, Andrew J. Bunker, James Colbert, Y. Sophia Dai, Bruce G. Elmegreen, Debra, Meloy Elmegreen, Steven Finkelstein, Dale Kocevski

TL;DR
This study measures the gas-phase mass-metallicity relation at z~1-2 using a large galaxy sample, revealing its evolution and dependence on star formation rate, and compares observations with hydrodynamical simulations.
Contribution
It provides the largest and deepest measurement of the MZR at z~2, confirms the existence of a high-redshift M-Z-SFR relation, and evaluates the relation against simulations.
Findings
MZR evolves by 0.3 dex from z~0.1 to z~2
High SNR spectra confirm a high-redshift M-Z-SFR relation
Simulations show a steeper SFR dependence than observed
Abstract
We present a new measurement of the gas-phase mass-metallicity relation (MZR), and its dependence on star formation rates (SFRs) at 1.3 < z < 2.3. Our sample comprises 1056 galaxies with a mean redshift of z = 1.9, identified from the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) grism spectroscopy in the Cosmic Assembly Near-Infrared Deep Extragalactic Survey (CANDELS) and the WFC3 Infrared Spectroscopic Parallel Survey (WISP). This sample is four times larger than previous metallicity surveys at z ~ 2, and reaches an order of magnitude lower in stellar mass (10^8 M_sun). Using stacked spectra, we find that the MZR evolves by 0.3 dex relative to z ~ 0.1. Additionally, we identify a subset of 49 galaxies with high signal-to-noise (SNR) spectra and redshifts between 1.3 < z < 1.5, where H-alpha emission is observed along with [OIII] and [OII]. With accurate measurements of SFR in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
