Do we need to estimate the variance in robust mean estimation?
Qiang Sun

TL;DR
This paper introduces self-tuned robust mean estimators for heavy-tailed distributions that adaptively estimate variance, achieving optimal finite-sample performance without cross-validation.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel loss function and joint optimization approach for automatically tuning the robustification parameter in mean estimation.
Findings
Estimator achieves the Cramér-Rao lower bound.
Outperforms previous methods in efficiency.
Does not require cross-validation or Lepski's method.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose self-tuned robust estimators for estimating the mean of heavy-tailed distributions, which refer to distributions with only finite variances. Our approach introduces a new loss function that considers both the mean parameter and a robustification parameter. By jointly optimizing the empirical loss function with respect to both parameters, the robustification parameter estimator can automatically adapt to the unknown data variance, and thus the self-tuned mean estimator can achieve optimal finite-sample performance. Our method outperforms previous approaches in terms of both computational and asymptotic efficiency. Specifically, it does not require cross-validation or Lepski's method to tune the robustification parameter, and the variance of our estimator achieves the Cram\'er-Rao lower bound. Project source code is available at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models · Statistical Methods and Inference · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
