Stratification and the comparison between homological and tensor triangular support
Tobias Barthel, Drew Heard, Beren Sanders

TL;DR
This paper compares homological and tensor triangular support in tensor triangulated categories, proving their equivalence under stratification and clarifying their differences with counterexamples.
Contribution
It establishes a bijection between the homological and tensor triangular spectra and extends Balmer's work on support coincidence in stratified categories.
Findings
Support functions coincide in stratified categories
Bijection between homological and tensor spectra is proven
Counterexamples illustrate differences between support notions
Abstract
We compare the homological support and tensor triangular support for `big' objects in a rigidly-compactly generated tensor triangulated category. We prove that the comparison map from the homological spectrum to the tensor triangular spectrum is a bijection and that the two notions of support coincide whenever the category is stratified, extending work of Balmer. Moreover, we clarify the relations between salient properties of support functions and exhibit counter-examples highlighting the differences between homological and tensor triangular support.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
