Intake Design for an Atmosphere-Breathing Electric Propulsion System (ABEP)
F. Romano, J. Espinosa-Orozco, M. Pfeiffer, G. Herdrich, N.H. Crisp,, P.C.E. Roberts, B. E.A. Holmes, S. Edmondson, S. Haigh, S. Livadiotti, and A. Macario-Rojas, V.T. A. Oiko, L.A. Sinpetru, K. Smith, J., Becedas, V. Sulliotti-Linner, M. Bisgaard, S. Christensen, V., Hanessian

TL;DR
This paper designs and simulates intake systems for Atmosphere-Breathing Electric Propulsion (ABEP) to optimize atmospheric particle collection for low-altitude space missions, focusing on diffuse and specular material properties.
Contribution
It introduces optimized intake designs based on diffuse and specular reflections, analyzing their efficiency for ABEP systems at low orbital altitudes.
Findings
Diffuse intake efficiency up to 0.46
Specular intake efficiency up to 0.94
Flow misalignment significantly affects diffuse intake performance
Abstract
Challenging space missions include those at very low altitudes, where the atmosphere is source of aerodynamic drag on the spacecraft. To extend the lifetime of such missions, an efficient propulsion system is required. One solution is Atmosphere-Breathing Electric Propulsion (ABEP) that collects atmospheric particles to be used as propellant for an electric thruster. The system would minimize the requirement of limited propellant availability and can also be applied to any planetary body with atmosphere, enabling new missions at low altitude ranges for longer times. IRS is developing, within the H2020 DISCOVERER project, an intake and a thruster for an ABEP system. The article describes the design and simulation of the intake, optimized to feed the radio frequency (RF) Helicon-based plasma thruster developed at IRS. The article deals in particular with the design of intakes based on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
