Nanophotonic chiral sensing: How does it actually work?
Steffen Both, Martin Sch\"aferling, Florian Sterl, Egor Muljarov,, Harald Giessen, and Thomas Weiss

TL;DR
This paper develops a comprehensive theoretical framework for nanophotonic chiral sensing, elucidating the underlying light-matter interactions and enabling more efficient spectral predictions, which advances the understanding and design of chiral sensors.
Contribution
It introduces a general perturbation-based theory for chiral light-matter interactions in arbitrary resonators, bridging the gap between simple models and numerical simulations.
Findings
Identifies resonance shift and mode excitation changes as key interaction mechanisms.
Provides a more efficient method for spectral prediction in chiral sensing.
Offers insights for optimizing nanophotonic structures for enhanced chiral detection.
Abstract
Nanophotonic chiral sensing has recently attracted a lot of attention. The idea is to exploit the strong light-matter interaction in nanophotonic resonators to determine the concentration of chiral molecules at ultra-low thresholds, which is highly attractive for numerous applications in life science and chemistry. However, a thorough understanding of the underlying interactions is still missing. The theoretical description relies on either simple approximations or on purely numerical approaches. We close this gap and present a general theory of chiral light-matter interactions in arbitrary resonators. Our theory describes the chiral interaction as a perturbation of the resonator modes, also known as resonant states or quasi-normal modes. We observe two dominant contributions: A chirality-induced resonance shift and changes in the modes excitation and emission efficiencies. Our theory…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
