Observation of gravitational waves from two neutron star-black hole coalescences
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, and the, KAGRA Collaboration: R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K., Ackley, A. Adams, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, D., Agarwal, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, N. Aggarwal, O. D. Aguiar

TL;DR
This paper reports the first direct detections of gravitational waves from two neutron star-black hole mergers, providing insights into their properties, rates, and astrophysical implications.
Contribution
The paper presents the first observations of gravitational waves from neutron star-black hole binaries, expanding the catalog of compact binary mergers and constraining their astrophysical rates.
Findings
Detected two NSBH merger events with component masses consistent with neutron stars and black holes.
Estimated NSBH merger rate density between 45 and 130 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}.
Provided constraints on component masses, spins, and distances of the observed systems.
Abstract
We report the observation of gravitational waves from two compact binary coalescences in LIGO's and Virgo's third observing run with properties consistent with neutron star-black hole (NSBH) binaries. The two events are named GW200105_162426 and GW200115_042309, abbreviated as GW200105 and GW200115; the first was observed by LIGO Livingston and Virgo, and the second by all three LIGO-Virgo detectors. The source of GW200105 has component masses and , whereas the source of GW200115 has component masses and (all measurements quoted at the 90% credible level). The probability that the secondary's mass is below the maximal mass of a neutron star is 89%-96% and 87%-98%, respectively, for GW200105 and GW200115, with the ranges arising from different astrophysical assumptions. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
