On closures for reduced order models $-$ A spectrum of first-principle to machine-learned avenues
Shady E. Ahmed, Suraj Pawar, Omer San, Adil Rasheed, Traian Iliescu,, Bernd R. Noack

TL;DR
This paper reviews the evolution of reduced order models in fluid mechanics, emphasizing how data-driven approaches, including machine learning, have transformed ROM closures and modeling strategies over the past two decades.
Contribution
It highlights the impact of data-driven modeling on ROM closures, illustrating principles and discussing future directions for integrating machine learning into ROM development.
Findings
Data-driven modeling significantly improves ROM closures.
Modern machine learning techniques enhance the accuracy of under-resolved simulations.
The paper outlines future prospects for data-driven ROM methodologies.
Abstract
For over a century, reduced order models (ROMs) have been a fundamental discipline of theoretical fluid mechanics. Early examples include Galerkin models inspired by the Orr-Sommerfeld stability equation and numerous vortex models, of which the von K\'arm\'an vortex street is one of the most prominent. Subsequent ROMs typically relied on first principles, like mathematical Galerkin models, weakly nonlinear stability theory, and two- and three-dimensional vortex models. Aubry et al. [N. Aubry, P. Holmes, J. Lumley, and E. Stone, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 192, 115-173 (1988)] pioneered data-driven proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) modeling. In early POD modeling, available data was used to build an optimal basis, which was then utilized in a classical Galerkin procedure to construct the ROM. But data has made a profound impact on ROMs beyond the Galerkin expansion. In this paper, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
