Additive Sparsification of CSPs
Eden Pelleg, Stanislav \v{Z}ivn\'y

TL;DR
This paper proves that all Boolean and finite-domain CSPs can be approximated by additive sparsifiers, simplifying the structure needed for efficient approximation algorithms without edge weights.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of additive sparsification for CSPs and proves that such sparsifiers exist for all Boolean and finite-domain predicates.
Findings
All Boolean CSPs admit additive sparsifiers.
Finite-domain CSPs also admit additive sparsifiers under a new all-but-one sparsification notion.
The results extend sparsification techniques to a broader class of problems.
Abstract
Multiplicative cut sparsifiers, introduced by Bencz\'ur and Karger [STOC'96], have proved extremely influential and found various applications. Precise characterisations were established for sparsifiability of graphs with other 2-variable predicates on Boolean domains by Filtser and Krauthgamer [SIDMA'17] and non-Boolean domains by Butti and \v{Z}ivn\'y [SIDMA'20]. Bansal, Svensson and Trevisan [FOCS'19] introduced a weaker notion of sparsification termed "additive sparsification", which does not require weights on the edges of the graph. In particular, Bansal et al. designed algorithms for additive sparsifiers for cuts in graphs and hypergraphs. As our main result, we establish that all Boolean Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) admit an additive sparsifier; that is, for every Boolean predicate of a fixed arity , we show that CSP() admits an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Auction Theory and Applications · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
